It is one thing for a Rank and file Crusader to fall to the blind rage, it is another beast upon itself when a Lord, one of the true champions of the Crusade falls to the Bloodlust. These unhinged lords will weather the storm of enemy fire, and stride through the worst elements of combat to rend and tear their foes.
What a damn exploitation gem from Manilla...Underrated and not for intellectuals, but rather single blue collars after work or for sundays matinees. Lousy directing, laughable dialogues as in a cartoon album for ten years old kids, corny script, where sub characters are so unusual, where there is no real lead role and a topic for which the audience never gets bored. Every one watching this film wishes the gang to suceed in his task: rob the bank. The most unexpected heist film I have ever seen and of course improbable too, except DOBERMAN GANG, where a bank heist was pulled not by blind men but dogs; you can confound both movies, at least put them on the same scale. I highly prefer this to any Hollywood one hundred million dollars budget crap. I repeat, tha main thing to remember is that there is NO LEAD, MAIN character in this movie. And that's the first time in my moviegoer life that I see a film where the "should be main character" appears in the last seven minutes of the feature. All the rest of the crew, the cast have already "disappeared". Sooo unexpected, and hat's precisely what I like. I love.
Blind Rage sub download
Download Zip: https://tinurli.com/2vDxnr
Incredibly unique, though not remotely good story about syndicate of gangsters who stage a bank robbery using blind men. Give them points for the unique plot, take away a good many more for poor acting, bad dubbing and some of the most bizarre jaw dropping twists in a film. This is truly a bad movie lovers delight and the sort of thing to inflict, er, share with friends of a similar mind. Amazing, in a mind bending sort of way. Come on, can you really take a movie seriously who has the wonderful line of dialog "All Units its all going down at the International House of Pancakes". Even Fred Williamson, touted as the nominal star walks through his scenes (he's only in the last 10 minutes) in such away that he makes it clear it's a pay check job. (Williamson's scenes appear to have been shot in one day and you can watch as the sun's shadows lengthen as the sequences go on). The back of the DVD called this film a must see, I would add only for those wanting to see cinema of the strange, all others stay away.
In the wake of the Vietnam war, the United States plans to send millions of dollars in aid to Southeast Asia, in order to prevent a feared "domino effect" of instability in the region. For some reason, the U.S. government didn't foresee that a criminal mastermind named Johnny Duran (Davao) has hired a woman named Sally (Hermosa) to corral a group of blind men to stage a robbery on the bank where the money is being held. BLIND MEN ROBBING A BANK. That's pretty much it. That is, until Jesse Crowder (Williamson) shows up to get to the bottom of the heist and get justice. Will the blind indeed lead the blind...to a multi-million dollar payoff? Find out today...? The original Blind Fury (1989), Blind Rage is the original vision impairment-based action movie. While we absolutely fell in love with the concept of the film: namely, a group of multi-racial blindies getting together for a bank heist, a couple of things weigh down the movie as a whole. The main detriment is the slow pace. There are long, extensively detailed scenes of "robbery practice" where Sally teaches the blind boys of Alabama how to properly execute the heist. The other thing is a mixed blessing. It's the inclusion of Fred Williamson. His appearance towards the end of the film rescues the movie from the doldrums, but the problem is, Fred should have been involved the whole time. Let's not forget this is from the same director as Ninja Assassins (1978), the movie where Cameron Mitchell didn't appear until the third act. Maybe that's director Pinon's idea of playing his last ace.There are plenty of things to admire about Blind Rage, however. The 70's style we all know and love is in evidence, best exemplified by the massive cars that are roughly the size of aircraft carriers. The funk on the soundtrack and the rotary phones reinforce the vibe as well, not to mention the loudly patterned shirts and wood-paneled rec rooms. Speaking of the soundtrack, there's this one annoying high-pitched note that appears at least twice in the movie, and it's so ear-shatteringly irritating, and is held for such an interminably long time, we actually had to hit mute. Hopfully that wasn't Pinon's idea of suspense music. But that one note (not to be confused with the movie's idea) is washed away by the funk, as well as the presences of Fong and Williamson.Fong plays a guy blinded during a fight with the triads, and Fred is just cool (he even exits a car in an extremely cool manner), but the rest of the acting is hilariously stilted and packed with funny pauses. That alone makes Blind Rage worth seeing, despite its flaws. And let's not forget the immortal credit "Golay as Chan". Yes, there is a man (?) out there simply named Golay. He's obviously the Cher or Madonna of the Philippines. And he played Chan. So now you know. Golay, we hardly knew ye.Featuring a song we think is called "The System" by Helen Gamboa (Manila's answer to Shirley Bassey?), Blind Rage does have some dull moments and is flawed, but the overall concept and some of the sillier moments make for relatively painless viewing.
Those Crusaders who have become overcome with rage will often fall in their duty to uphold the honors of the eternal crusade, and will instead dedicate themselves to the endless carnage that the future can offer.
Heard descended into screaming fits of blind rage, sent incoherent text messages at 4 a.m. and was often drunk and high on illegal drugs, Kate James testified in a video deposition that was played in court Thursday during the trial for Depp's libel suit against Heard.
Behavior due to causes or stimuli so powerful that they have produced psychological alterations such as outbursts, blind rage or other similar passionate states, is usually the common denominator of a good part of the cases for which forensic and/or criminological analysis of human conduct is undertaken The psychological profile of a 40-year-old patient and the juridical-legal consequences of a crime against human life perpetrated are described, from the harmful and toxic influence of his emotions and seized by the anger and anger he maintained against the victim, giving him a punch of such intensity that it caused him to lose consciousness enough and necessary to cause his death due to the strong impact of the skull on the ground. In this case, the perpetrator's outburst was caused because the victim had surreptitiously supplied drugs to her affective-sentimental partner.
Results indicated that paranoid personality disorder was prevalent among homicide offenders while antisocial personality disorder was prevalent among non-homicide offenders [2]. In the present case, in a party at a prestigious coastal nightclub, the interesting case of how a subject was overwhelmed by harmful emotions related to a bad experience as a result of the death of a family member from the consumption of toxins, on observing the victim offering toxic substances to his partner, he perpetrated a crime of intentional homicide by punching him with such intensity that he immediately became unconscious, falling on thespot, inflicting a fatal blow to his occipital region [3,4].The psychological profile of the subject and the juridical-legal consequences of said behavior, perpetrated from the perspective of an outburst or blind rage, are described [5,6]. Case Description The patient is a 40-year-old man, with a high school education level, who reported having worked as a manager in hotels and restaurants for about 15 years. Likewise, he also mentioned that he had worked as a Security Guard and had knowledge of fighting sports, such as Jiu-Jitsu, Boxing and Kick Boxing.
During the anamnesis carried out at the penitentiary center where he had been serving a custodial sentence for 3 years as a preventive inmate awaiting trial, he said that throughout his life he had had the bad experience of having seen how his brother "had eventually lost his life due to the consumption of toxic substances and that he would never want the same for the people". The 40-year-old man added that due to that adverse episode in his biography, on observing how the victim had supplied substances to his sentimental partner, he was "seized with rage to put a stop to that situation."
It is interesting to point out that the scales gathered as clinically and statistically significant in both tests administered (MCMI-III and PAI): "Antisocial traits", "Aggressiveness", "Paranoia" or "Dominance" (in the case of the PAI), are behavioral patterns which tend to manifest with a certain pathological impulsiveness and that would help explain the states of outburst or blind rage.
Within this behavioral context, the aggressor manifested an acute and critical psycho-emotional alteration, immediately prior to the commission of the tragic event; or put another way, he let himself be seized by the negative emotions of rage and a psychological state of emotional outburst that pervaded harmfully and dangerously in his behavior.
The defendant is considered materially responsible for a crime of intentional homicide, with the concurrence of the highly qualified extenuating circumstance of outburst or blind rage and the simple one of repairing the damage, imposing a sentence of four years and six months prison. Conclusion From the forensic point of view, states of outburst or blindrage (or similar state of passion) cannot be measured directly with psychological tests. These psychological-emotional forensic situations can only be established from the analytical perspective of the rest of the potentially indicative elements that can support the argumentation of said state of outburst or similar. In this case, in the security video recordings, it was possible to directly observe the course of events or iter criminis of the perpetrator and the forensic psychopathological expert was a complementary aid in the technical explanation of the behavior that was the object of analysis. 2ff7e9595c
Комментарии